2015
DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive Interfaces in Direct Numerical Simulation of Pore-Scale Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), as well as those of many synthetics play a critical role in controlling the physical properties of and processes in rocks (Emmanuel et al 2015;Navarre-Sitchler et al 2015;Royne and Jamtveit 2015, this volume), and the interaction between them and the fl uid that are stored, fl ow through, precipitate in (Stack 2015, this volume) and react with (Liu et al 2015;Molins 2015;Putnis 2015, this volume) them. The better we understand and can quantify those porous structures, the better will be our ability to model, understand and predict the evolution of geological environments, either under natural conditions or those such as CO 2 or radiological waste sequestration, or addition or removal of other fl uids from geological reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), as well as those of many synthetics play a critical role in controlling the physical properties of and processes in rocks (Emmanuel et al 2015;Navarre-Sitchler et al 2015;Royne and Jamtveit 2015, this volume), and the interaction between them and the fl uid that are stored, fl ow through, precipitate in (Stack 2015, this volume) and react with (Liu et al 2015;Molins 2015;Putnis 2015, this volume) them. The better we understand and can quantify those porous structures, the better will be our ability to model, understand and predict the evolution of geological environments, either under natural conditions or those such as CO 2 or radiological waste sequestration, or addition or removal of other fl uids from geological reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In porous media simulations, the feedback between precipitation and reactive surface area is often accounted for using constitutive relationships that decrease reactive surface area as the pore space is reduced (Garcia‐Rios et al, ; Molins, ). Our preliminary results suggest that the application of these relationships to fracture surfaces is not appropriate because precipitation increases the lateral extent, and surface area, of the reactive minerals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, Darcy‐scale modeling studies often resort to using the reactive surface area as calibration parameter to match observations. In the pore‐scale approach, however, the reactive surface area is derived from the geometry of the mineral‐fluid interface and often, as done here, assumed to be equal to the physical area of this interface [ Molins , ]. Recent pore‐scale simulations using this assumption and literature‐derived rate parameters have shown good agreement to data from single calcite grain experiments [ De Baere et al ., ] and grain pack experiments [ Molins et al ., ].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While gridding schemes that conform to the domain boundary, e.g., unstructured grid methods, can capture complex interface geometries by appropriate meshing strategies, remeshing is required when solid‐fluid interfaces evolve due to dissolution‐precipitation reactions. In contrast, structured‐mesh models require a method to represent the interfaces such as the immersed boundary method [ Benioug et al ., ] or the embedded boundary method [ Miller and Trebotich , ; Molins , ]. The embedded boundary method, which uses cut cells that result from intersecting the irregular fluid‐solid interfaces with structured Cartesian grids, makes it possible to take advantage of structured methods while capturing complex surficial geometries [ Trebotich et al ., ; Trebotich and Graves , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%