2017
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000005975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (Romo1) as a novel diagnostic marker for lung cancer-related malignant effusion

Abstract: Reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (Romo1) is a novel protein that plays an important role in intracellular reactive oxygen species generation. Recently, Romo1 has been suggested to have diagnostic and prognostic potential in lung cancer. However, there is no data on the diagnostic value of Romo1 level in malignant pleural effusion. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of Romo1 in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusion in lung cancer patients. Pleural fluid Romo1 level was measured using enzyme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we did not evaluate or compare the clinical utility of other biomarkers. As previous studies have suggested,29,30 a comparison with diagnostic value or an investigation of the combined effect with established biomarkers or serum ROMO1 would provide more informative data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, we did not evaluate or compare the clinical utility of other biomarkers. As previous studies have suggested,29,30 a comparison with diagnostic value or an investigation of the combined effect with established biomarkers or serum ROMO1 would provide more informative data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The diagnostic use of biomarkers for MPE is based on discriminating lung cancer from BPE with considerable sensitivity and specificity. Previous studies have already investigated the clinical value of several biomarkers in pleural fluid including (CEA), CYFRA21-1, CA125 and Romo1 [ 16 18 ]. Among those, CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA125 were widely accepted in clinical performance as to distinguishing MPE from BPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using blood and PE markers is useful for distinguishing TPEs from AD-MPEs, such as adenosine deaminase and carcinoembryonic antigen [13,14]. A number of markers can be used to predict TPEs and AD-MPEs, although their use of markers is considerably less speci c than histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%