1979
DOI: 10.1002/actp.1979.010300109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive polymers. XXII. Preparation of poly(2,3‐epoxypropyl methacrylate) on porous glass

Abstract: 2.3-Epoxypropyl methacrylate sorbed on porous glass was polymcrized by radical mechanism. The polymerization conditions were chosen so that the polymer obtained was linear or only very slightly crosslinked. The amount of the polymer on glass can be varied arbitrarily by diluting the polymerization mixture or by varying the amount of water on glass. The specific surface of the system decreases with increasing polymer content. With increasing specific surface of porous glass, i. e. with decreasing diameter of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we exploited chemical grafting from melt to fabricate the EHBP monolayer by using the known reaction between silanol and epoxy groups at elevated temperatures.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we exploited chemical grafting from melt to fabricate the EHBP monolayer by using the known reaction between silanol and epoxy groups at elevated temperatures.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the hydrophobic shell of predominantly alkyl branches prevented the formation of anchored macromolecules on a hydrophilic silicon surface. Therefore, we exploited chemical grafting from melt to fabricate the EHBP layer by using the known reaction between silanol groups and epoxy groups initiated at elevated temperatures (Scheme ). , The crucial point was to find a balance between the rate of grafting of epoxy-containing branches and the rate of dewetting caused by the interaction between hydrophobic branches and the hydrophilic silicon surface. We varied grafting conditions, such as concentration of the solution, thickness of the initial film, grafting time, and temperature, to avoid the dewetting phenomenon and ensure the formation of anchored and robust uniform layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data are obtained by imaging with tip radius 12.4 nm. Molecular weight distribution of HBP3 is based on the diameter distribution data (histogram) and GPC data (solid line) (b) Surface distribution of the elastic modulus and adhesive forces for the HBP3 nanoparticles on NHz SAM layer obtained with 64 x 64 probings within the I x 1 pm surface area (top). Correlation between height, young' s modulus and adhesion (bottom) Correlation of the height and elastic modulus for the HBP3 nanoparticles on NHz SAM layw obtained with 32 x 32 probings.…”
Section: Sessol Droplet Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%