2016
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofw113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive School Closure During Increased Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Activity in Western Kentucky, 2013: A Field Evaluation of Effect on ILI Incidence and Economic and Social Consequences for Families

Abstract: A reactive school closure following high influenza-like illness-related student absenteeism in a Kentucky school district did not influence reported influenza-like illness transmission in student households.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Database searches yielded 3,341 papers and two additional papers were identified via hand-searching; 770 duplicates were removed and the remaining 2,573 were screened for relevance. After this screening, a total of 19 papers remained and were included in the review, 18 of which [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] used a cross-sectional design employing questionnaires to assess difficulties during the school closures, activities outside the home during the closures and/or who provided childcare during the closures. The remaining paper [14] used a qualitative design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Database searches yielded 3,341 papers and two additional papers were identified via hand-searching; 770 duplicates were removed and the remaining 2,573 were screened for relevance. After this screening, a total of 19 papers remained and were included in the review, 18 of which [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] used a cross-sectional design employing questionnaires to assess difficulties during the school closures, activities outside the home during the closures and/or who provided childcare during the closures. The remaining paper [14] used a qualitative design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (n = 10) were from the US [19,21,[23][24][25]27,30,[32][33][34]; four papers were from Australia [14,20,22,29] and the remaining papers were from Argentina [28], Japan [26], Russia [18], Taiwan [31] and the UK [17]. Most papers reported on school closures because of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic (n = 12) [14,17,19,20,22,[24][25][26]28,29,31,32] or other influenza or influenza-like outbreaks (n = 6) [18,21,23,27,30,33]. One paper reported on a school closed in preparation for a hurricane [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School closures may reduce rates of medically-attended influenza in school-aged children, although with highly heterogeneous effects (2% to 29% reductions), and with lesser effects on younger children and adults. [1][2][3][4][5] Generalizing to broader social distancing efforts from these studies is difficult, however, as school closures tend to have limited impacts on working-age and older adults, and school-aged children may recongregate outside of schools. 4,[6][7][8] In February 2019, unusually high snowfall in western Washington State led to widespread school and workplace closures and to reduced regional travel.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mizumoto et al (2013), Japan [25] Another household member (64.3%), left alone (28.5%), special arrangement such as parental absence from work (7.3%). Russell et al (2016), USA [26] Adult from outside the household (20%); childcare programme (1%) Steelfisher et al (2010), USA [31] 81% were cared for by an adult in the household, 20% by a family member outside the household, 1% by a friend/neighbour, 3% by a professional care provider, and 10% stayed home alone. Old enough to care for themselves (11.6%), went to work with parents (5.3%), childcare program (2.6%), left alone without supervision (2.5%).…”
Section: Effler Et Al (2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28.5% children looked after themselves; 64.3% were looked after by another household member; 7.3% required a special arrangement such as parental absence from work. Russell et al (2016), USA [26] 99 households, representing 197 children;…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%