2021
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-56-57-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive transport model of kinetically controlled celestite to barite replacement

Abstract: Abstract. Barite formation is of concern for many utilisations of the geological subsurface, ranging from oil and gas extraction to geothermal reservoirs. It also acts as a scavenger mineral for the retention of radium within nuclear waste repositories. The impact of its precipitation on flow properties has been shown to vary by many orders of magnitude, emphasising the need for robust prediction models. An experimental flow-through column setup on the laboratory scale investigating the replacement of celestit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, barite supersaturation was orders of magnitude higher (this study: SR < 10, experiment: SR 1000). Thus, nucleation was an important precipitation process in the experiments [19,65], but there is evidence that it is negligible for this study [1] (and references therein). Microstructural rock alteration patterns are, therefore, expected to be distinctly different; accordingly, we used the Kozeny-Carman relationship as a default.…”
Section: Scaling Score and Implications For Geothermal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, barite supersaturation was orders of magnitude higher (this study: SR < 10, experiment: SR 1000). Thus, nucleation was an important precipitation process in the experiments [19,65], but there is evidence that it is negligible for this study [1] (and references therein). Microstructural rock alteration patterns are, therefore, expected to be distinctly different; accordingly, we used the Kozeny-Carman relationship as a default.…”
Section: Scaling Score and Implications For Geothermal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 71%