“…[19,22] The metric parameters of 1 (1: C1À Cu1, 1.948(3); Cu1À B1, 1.974(3) Å; C1À Cu1À B1, 177.35 (13); O1À B1À O1, 106.7(2)°) and its analogue, [(IPr)CuBcat], [19] are similar ([(IPr)CuBcat]: C1À Cu1, 1.9309(15); B1À Cu1, 1.978(2) Å; C1À Cu1À B1, 174.22 (7); O1À B1À O2, 106.96(13)°). Similarly, the CÀ CuÀ B core of 2 (2: C1À Cu1, 1.9446(15); Cu1À B1, 1.999(2); B1À O1, 1.393(2); B1À O2, 1.386(2) Å; C1À Cu1À B1, 171.35 (7); O1À B1À O1, 117.58 (16); N1À C1À N2, 116.56(13)°) and the comparative metrics for [(IPr)CuBneop] [22] deviated little, but these two compounds showed vast differences in stability. [(IPr)CuBneop] decomposed within hours at room temperature to IPr, neop 2 B 2 , copper metal, and a number of more remarkable products including [(IPr) 6 Cu 55 ] and [(IPr) 12 Cu 179 ].…”