1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19970715)18:9<1190::aid-jcc7>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity of haloethanes with hydroxyl radicals: Effects of basis set and correlation energy on reaction energetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the annihilation of the spin contamination from the unrestricted wave functions seems to be mandatory for calculation of both reaction enthalpies and barrier heights. This result is in agreement with results of previous investigations of radical reactions. ,,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the annihilation of the spin contamination from the unrestricted wave functions seems to be mandatory for calculation of both reaction enthalpies and barrier heights. This result is in agreement with results of previous investigations of radical reactions. ,,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Gaussian-2 theory fails to describe the investigated reactions as a consequence of the inferior results obtained by the MP2, MP4, and QCISD(T) methods in combination with small basis sets such as 6-311G(d,p) and 6-311+G(d,p) that are used within the G2 scheme. Therefore, the G2 method is not suitable for the prediction of energetics of OH addition to ethene and halogenated analogues, in contrast to the very good results obtained for abstraction reactions . The best results are obtained using the MP2 method with large basis sets, such as 6-311+G(3df,2p), 6-311++G(3df,2pd), aug-cc-pVDZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ, which are in agreement with measured reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The BSSE corrected barrier height is found to be widely off from the corresponding experimental value. Similar observation was made earlier by Sekusak and Sabljic for the reaction between haloethanes and OH radical 7 Basis Set Superposition Error (in kcal/mol) Calculated by the Counterpoise Method for Barrier Heights of Hydrogen Abstraction Reactions between Dichloroethane and OH Radical a TSMP2QCISD(T) α-TS1 4.67 4.75 β-TS2 4.82 4.91 β-TS3 4.63 4.70 T-TS4 4.58 4.75 T-TS5 5.47 5.63 G-TS6 5.43 5.60 G-TS7 4.55 4.64 a Calculations were performed with the 6-311G(d,p) basis set. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Scheiner and co-workers analyzed this problem for the proton transfer reaction . Very recently, Sekusak and Sabljic evaluated the effect of BSSE on the calculated activation energies for the hydrogen abstraction reactions between haloethanes and OH radical . They observed that the uncorrected results were always more close to the experiment than the BSSE corrected results and advised that one should use BSSE uncorrected results obtained from a reasonably large basis set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 For reactive surfaces, we use results from calculations without counterpoise corrections because they can sometimes worsen results in such situations. 85 In this work, single-point energy calculations are often preceded by geometry optimizations, allowing secondary geometrical parameters to relax in response to those explicitly varied. As an example, an optimization using restricted second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (RMP2) with the AVDZ basis set and followed by an RCCSD(T) singlepoint energy calculation using the AVTZ basis set is designated by the abbreviation MP2/AVDZ//RCCSD(T)/AVTZ.…”
Section: The Interaction Energy Of Two Monomers a And B Is Defined Asmentioning
confidence: 99%