2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity of one-, two-, three- and four-electron reduced forms of α-[P2W18O62]6− generated by controlled potential electrolysis in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At pH 7, each of these waves is a simple one-electron process (black line in Figure 1B), as determined by controlled potential bulk electrolysis and by UV-vis titration, which agrees with literature reports for this compound (see Figures S2-4 to S2-6). 38 However, as the pH is lowered to 4, both peaks below 0 V become two-electron processes, as previously of polyoxometalate (Figure 1C and Figure S2-7). Such behaviour suggested to us that the storage of electrons in the polyoxometalate was protoncoupled, and that as the concentration of polyoxometalate in solution increased (and the pH decreased) it might be possible to store an increasing number of electrons in the polyoxometalate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…At pH 7, each of these waves is a simple one-electron process (black line in Figure 1B), as determined by controlled potential bulk electrolysis and by UV-vis titration, which agrees with literature reports for this compound (see Figures S2-4 to S2-6). 38 However, as the pH is lowered to 4, both peaks below 0 V become two-electron processes, as previously of polyoxometalate (Figure 1C and Figure S2-7). Such behaviour suggested to us that the storage of electrons in the polyoxometalate was protoncoupled, and that as the concentration of polyoxometalate in solution increased (and the pH decreased) it might be possible to store an increasing number of electrons in the polyoxometalate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Compound 1 was converted to a singly reduced state (correlating well with spectroelectrochemical analysis, Figure S5 in the Supporting Information), whereas the {P 2 W 17 } anion showed no discernible photo‐reduction (up to 2 h irradiation). Interestingly, the properties of {P 2 W 18 } were found to be intermediate between the two other species, showing only partial (2 e − ) reduction during the course of the experiment . Given that the extinction of both 1 and {P 2 W 18 } at 390 nm is almost identical, the effective photoactivity of each compound is therefore clearly dependent upon both optical and redox properties (i.e., the energies of both the LUMO level and the HOMO–LUMO gap) …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly,t he properties of {P 2 W 18 }w ere found to be intermediate between the two other species, showingo nly partial (2 e À )r eduction during the course of the experiment. [13,14] Given that the extinction of both 1 and {P 2 W 18 }a t3 90 nm is almosti dentical, the effective photoactivity of each compound is therefore clearly dependent upon both optical and redox properties (i.e.,t he energies of both the LUMO level and the HOMO-LUMO gap). [4a] To validate whether the enhanced photosensitivity of 1 was reflected in its catalytic activity,w ee xplored its photooxidative performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, photoreduction again occurred preferentially at the interface with initial diffusion of ½P 2 W 18 O 62 7− into the aqueous phase followed by subsequent extraction into the IL phase. 5− in wet acetonitrile, confirming that the role of reversible potential also is significant (8,28). In general terms the overall reaction is represented by Eq.…”
Section: − Ilmentioning
confidence: 53%