1986
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(86)80058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactor analysis of a chlor—alkali membrane cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained in this work are comparable to those reported by Chandran et al 21 for a similar PP cell but with a higher electroactive area (34.3 cm 2 ). It is worth mentioning that the material of the electrodes and the cation-exchange membrane used by Chandran et al 21 are different from the ones used in this work (see details in Figure 7). However, results for both PP cells are virtually the same.…”
Section: Comparison With the Parallel Plate Cell And Literature Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Results obtained in this work are comparable to those reported by Chandran et al 21 for a similar PP cell but with a higher electroactive area (34.3 cm 2 ). It is worth mentioning that the material of the electrodes and the cation-exchange membrane used by Chandran et al 21 are different from the ones used in this work (see details in Figure 7). However, results for both PP cells are virtually the same.…”
Section: Comparison With the Parallel Plate Cell And Literature Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They mentioned that during the membrane potential measurement, two Luggin capillaries could not be placed with sufficient accuracy (the zero gap configuration had a gap of 0.5-1 mm). Chandran et al [36] also reported similar experimental difficulties, resulting in large measured membrane potentials. Table 5.…”
Section: Model Validation For Low Current Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One of the valuable responses which are directly proportional to total energy consumed by an electrolysis cell is the current efficiency. The caustic current efficiency (CCE) as cell performance was thus measured according to the procedure described in Section 2 and calculated based on the following equation [14]:…”
Section: Cathode Performancementioning
confidence: 99%