2018
DOI: 10.4103/jisha.jisha_20_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readability ease of online hearing-related information in Hindi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each readability formula uses a different approach to calculate the RGL as explained in Table 4. Various drawbacks exist regarding the use of readability formulae as very few are validated (Diwan & Kelly-Campbell, 2018) and no standard for selecting readability formulae exists. The approach taken was thus to select the three most common formulae generally recommended for health care literature: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (Kincaid, Fishburne, Rogers, & Chissom, 1975), The Fry (Fry, 1968) and Raygor Readability Estimate (Raygor, 1977).…”
Section: [Insert Table 2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each readability formula uses a different approach to calculate the RGL as explained in Table 4. Various drawbacks exist regarding the use of readability formulae as very few are validated (Diwan & Kelly-Campbell, 2018) and no standard for selecting readability formulae exists. The approach taken was thus to select the three most common formulae generally recommended for health care literature: the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (Kincaid, Fishburne, Rogers, & Chissom, 1975), The Fry (Fry, 1968) and Raygor Readability Estimate (Raygor, 1977).…”
Section: [Insert Table 2]mentioning
confidence: 99%