2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readability of Arthroscopy-Related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Readability analysis was performed using well‐validated scales that have been commonly used to evaluate healthcare‐related materials . Readability scores were measured using the following tests: Flesch Reading Ease Formula, Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Fog Scale, SMOG Index, Coleman–Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, Linsear Write Formula, including the composite Text Readability Consensus Calculator ( Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readability analysis was performed using well‐validated scales that have been commonly used to evaluate healthcare‐related materials . Readability scores were measured using the following tests: Flesch Reading Ease Formula, Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Fog Scale, SMOG Index, Coleman–Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, Linsear Write Formula, including the composite Text Readability Consensus Calculator ( Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study had several limitations. Although the FKGL scoring system is well validated [2,5,13,17,44,47,54,58,63], it only factors in written text-not illustrated, video, or audio content, which may improve understanding of content. An important additional potential study limitation is the assumption that the reading skills of those reading the AAOS patient education materials are equivalent to the general US adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each document, the well-validated Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) formula was used to analyze written material readability in terms of academic grade levels [2,5,13,17,44,47,54,58,63]. Although there are various readability assessment tools used in the healthcare setting, the FK formula is the most widely validated method of analyzing readability [2,5,13,17,44,47,54,58,63] The FKGLs of the AAOS articles were compared with the AMA/NIH-recommended readability level (sixth grade) [18,22,36,59,60] as well as the mean US adult reading level (eighth grade) [21,43,51] with data throughout the article being presented as mean ± SD except where otherwise specified and comparisons being performed using unpaired t-tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…only 2% of the articles were written at the or below the 8th grade level" (17). Finally, Yi et al analyzed the patient education material from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites and found only three examples of material written at or below the 8th grade level and only one was at the 6th or lower grade level (18). Indeed, the patient education material on many of the Web sites is strikingly similar to the patient education material found on the AAOS Web site, so it is not surprising that the reading level is so high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%