Readiness to implement contingency management to promote PrEP initiation and adherence among people who inject drugs: results from a multi-site implementation survey

Abstract

Background Contingency management (CM), an incentive-based intervention to encourage target behaviors, effectively promotes medication adherence. However, efforts to extend CM to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have been lacking. As part of a randomized clinical trial to promote HIV Prevention among people who inject drugs (PWID), we examined the readiness of staff in community-based organizations serving PWID to implement CM for PrEP uptake and adherence in this population. Methods From April to August 2022, we conducted a survey of staff from four community-based organizations providing HIV testing, harm reduction, and outreach services in the northeastern United States. We assessed knowledge and attitudes regarding PrEP for PWID on five-point Likert scales (e.g., Poor to Excellent, Not at all to Extremely). Using a modified version of the Contingency Management Beliefs Questionnaire, we assessed the degree to which attitudes about CM for HIV prevention influenced interest in its adoption on a scale from “1-No influence at all” to “5-Very strong influence”. We explored endorsement patterns, along with average values of individual items and subscale scores. Results Among 271 staff invitations, 123 (45.4%) responded. The majority (88.6%) of respondents reported prior PrEP awareness, with a mean self-rated knowledge of 2.98 out of 5 (SD = 1.1). Attitudes towards PrEP, including its relevance to and importance for clients (both means = 4.3), efficacy (mean = 4.5), and safety (mean = 4.2), were positive. Items related to practicality and confidence in providing PrEP-related care had relatively lower ratings. Respondents endorsed influential generalized (mean = 2.1) and training-related (mean = 2.5) CM implementation barriers less frequently than positive attitudes towards CM (mean = 3.6). Staff favored adding CM to existing services (mean = 3.8), and highly endorsed it as “useful for targeting HIV prevention with PrEP” (mean = 3.7). Conclusions Respondents generally supported the use of CM to promote HIV prevention among PWID and favored adding it to their existing services. Though respondents understood the value of both PrEP and CM to support HIV prevention activities, findings corroborate research citing relative lack of knowledge and confidence regarding PrEP management among clients, potentially detracting from implementation readiness. Trial Registration Number NCT04738825.