Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading

Abstract: Communication via written words is one of humanity's greatest inventions and plays a critical role in modern society. This chapter outlines the key cognitive, neural, and computational aspects of the reading system. In so doing, it shows how reading takes advantage of domain‐general processing abilities and bootstraps written communication from other neurocomputational systems, including vision and spoken language processing. It also explains how failure in different parts of the reading system can lead to rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 187 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, sensitivity to letter identity is found for every letter position across a relatively large and well‐controlled pool of words (e.g., having the same length and CVC structure). Of note, orthographic similarity accounts for the structure of the data beyond pure visual similarity, suggesting sensitivity to visual forms more abstract than the pictorial content of a given stimulus (Carreiras, Armstrong, & Dunabeitia, ). Additional correlations between decoding accuracy, on one hand, and word frequency and the number of orthographic neighbors, on the other, also confirm the impact of linguistic processing on our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, sensitivity to letter identity is found for every letter position across a relatively large and well‐controlled pool of words (e.g., having the same length and CVC structure). Of note, orthographic similarity accounts for the structure of the data beyond pure visual similarity, suggesting sensitivity to visual forms more abstract than the pictorial content of a given stimulus (Carreiras, Armstrong, & Dunabeitia, ). Additional correlations between decoding accuracy, on one hand, and word frequency and the number of orthographic neighbors, on the other, also confirm the impact of linguistic processing on our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%