2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617945114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading a 400,000-year record of earthquake frequency for an intraplate fault

Abstract: Our understanding of the frequency of large earthquakes at timescales longer than instrumental and historical records is based mostly on paleoseismic studies of fast-moving plate-boundary faults. Similar study of intraplate faults has been limited until now, because intraplate earthquake recurrence intervals are generally long (10s to 100s of thousands of years) relative to conventional paleoseismic records determined by trenching. Long-term variations in the earthquake recurrence intervals of intraplate fault… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, as listed in the following, there might be some important challenges of using this method solely as a paleoseismological technique: Since the carbonate bands may not be uniform along the entire fracture (Brogi & Capezzuoli, ), one crosscut of a vein could be insufficient for reconstructing the whole paleoseismic history of an area. Even if the fluid discharge and related carbonate precipitation start simultaneously with the earthquake (Brogi & Capezzuoli, ; Montgomery & Manga, ; Muir‐wood & King, ), the time it takes a coseismic band to reach its maximum thickness depends on several variables (Altunel & Karabacak, ; Karabacak et al, ; Mesci et al, ). Therefore, it is important that dating should be performed from the closest section of each band to the fracture wall (i.e., the plane where the precipitation first starts; Williams et al, ; Capezzuoli et al, ). Although each alternate band in a vein is in close relation with repeated fault reactivation, each vein may not record all seismic releases around the region. First, for a good coseismic carbonate record to be created the earthquake must have an intensity (I > VI, like our 1430 AD peak) to allow the opening of the planar fracture and second, have a close epicenter ( d < 200 km, unlike 1668 AD and 1939 AD events) that will allow permeability enhancement (Parvin et al, ; Shi et al, ). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, as listed in the following, there might be some important challenges of using this method solely as a paleoseismological technique: Since the carbonate bands may not be uniform along the entire fracture (Brogi & Capezzuoli, ), one crosscut of a vein could be insufficient for reconstructing the whole paleoseismic history of an area. Even if the fluid discharge and related carbonate precipitation start simultaneously with the earthquake (Brogi & Capezzuoli, ; Montgomery & Manga, ; Muir‐wood & King, ), the time it takes a coseismic band to reach its maximum thickness depends on several variables (Altunel & Karabacak, ; Karabacak et al, ; Mesci et al, ). Therefore, it is important that dating should be performed from the closest section of each band to the fracture wall (i.e., the plane where the precipitation first starts; Williams et al, ; Capezzuoli et al, ). Although each alternate band in a vein is in close relation with repeated fault reactivation, each vein may not record all seismic releases around the region. First, for a good coseismic carbonate record to be created the earthquake must have an intensity (I > VI, like our 1430 AD peak) to allow the opening of the planar fracture and second, have a close epicenter ( d < 200 km, unlike 1668 AD and 1939 AD events) that will allow permeability enhancement (Parvin et al, ; Shi et al, ). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, RIA enables us to analyze the profile of volatility in different magnitudes, and it does not have to make the presumption that the load between past and future should follow specific functional relationships [23]. Owing to its wide application, RIA is now used in diverse fields, including the study of climate [24], earthquake activities [25], heartbeat monitoring [26], and financial volatility [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the extreme event that has happened at a specific time, this method can estimate the recurrence probability of next one. This method has been proved efficient in forecasting nature hazards and financial market volatilities [20][21][22]. In practice, by analyzing the characteristics of the recurrence intervals of extreme power fluctuations, our study can help the energy administrator to forecast the hospital power system risk, both in probability and magnitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…So far, this RIA method has proved to be effective in forecasting natural hazards, financial market volatility, and electricity consumption features in units of enterprise and office building [11,[20][21][22][23]. Also, the introduction of high-frequent data is able to reflect the instantaneous fluctuation of power consumption, which does count for much more in hospital energy administration than daily data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%