PsycTESTS Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/t40077-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Attitudes among Middle School Students Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reading in and for school is assumed to be predominantly externally regulated (e.g., by the teacher, tasks, curriculum). In leisure time, by contrast, the choice of text is more internally regulated, which means that people decide for themselves or more autonomously which texts they want to read (e.g., Ivey and Broaddus, 2001;De Naeghel et al, 2012;McKenna et al, 2012). Therefore, students' reading behavior might be different in the two broader contexts.…”
Section: Leisure and School Reading Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading in and for school is assumed to be predominantly externally regulated (e.g., by the teacher, tasks, curriculum). In leisure time, by contrast, the choice of text is more internally regulated, which means that people decide for themselves or more autonomously which texts they want to read (e.g., Ivey and Broaddus, 2001;De Naeghel et al, 2012;McKenna et al, 2012). Therefore, students' reading behavior might be different in the two broader contexts.…”
Section: Leisure and School Reading Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the demand for instruments tailored to capture the reading experience of adolescents (see McKenna et al, 2012), reading motivation measurement scholars have amended existing questionnaires intended for elementary students to better suit older readers (Boltz, 2010;Guthrie, Wigfield, & Klauda, 2012;Pitcher et al, 2007), adapting questionnaire items to reflect more developmentally appropriate language (Boltz, 2010;Gambrell, Palmer, Codling, & Mazzoni, 1996;Pitcher et al, 2007) and including item content that addresses more extensive text types, such as expository text (Guthrie, Cambria, & Wigfield, 2009;Guthrie et al, 2012) and digital reading (McKenna et al, 2012). Yet, these items do not address distinctions between different content areas within school settings.…”
Section: Motivation Conceptualizations and Adolescent Literacy Framewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While educators and researchers agree on the crucial role of literacy motivation in reading performance, research on methods for accurately and validly assessing the reading motivation of adolescents is still uncommon (Davis, Tonks, Rodriguez, & Hock, 2015;McKenna, Conradi, Lawrence, Jang, & Meyer, 2012). The most frequently used instruments for measuring reading motivation do not attend to content-area-specific reading motivations and instead assess reading motivation as a more general construct (Schiefele, Schaffner, Möller, & Wigfield, 2012), with little sensitivity to the distinct reading activities students engage in across the disciplines (Buehl, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in the concept of motivation in reading research, due to increased recognition of its role in reading achievement (e.g., Toste et al, 2020) and amount and breadth of reading (e.g., Miyamoto et al, 2019). However, adolescence has been consistently associated with declines in reading motivation and in related constructs such as enjoyment (Clark and Douglas, 2011;Cole et al, 2022), attitude (McKenna et al, 2012;Allred and Cena, 2020), and frequency (Twenge et al, 2019) for both academic and recreational reading (Clark, 2019;Clark and Teravainen-Goff, 2020). Indeed, in the last 50 years, overall time spent reading for pleasure has declined amongst adolescents (Twenge et al, 2019), with fewer adolescents reporting enjoying reading for pleasure in 2022 than in the previous 15 years (Cole et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%