2015
DOI: 10.1080/08935696.2015.1007793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Gramsci through Fanon: Hegemony before Dominance in Revolutionary Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his study on hegemony and dominance established through settler colonialism, and the ways in which structural and revolutionary change can occur, Noaman G Ali (2015) looks at the work of Frantz Fanon and Gramsci. Fanon argues that national culture is built on a collective understanding of the struggles of the masses.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In his study on hegemony and dominance established through settler colonialism, and the ways in which structural and revolutionary change can occur, Noaman G Ali (2015) looks at the work of Frantz Fanon and Gramsci. Fanon argues that national culture is built on a collective understanding of the struggles of the masses.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nations that have suffered through a settler colonial past, this means bolstering indigenous history, culture, politics, and languages. Like Maira (2018), Ali (2015) points to the value and necessity of "an alliance of subordinate groups" and an understanding of the similar and differing ways they are impacted by systems of oppressions, such as the outcomes of ongoing colonialism, like systemic racism (2015, p.251).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gramsci contrasted ‘hegemony’ with its related concept of ‘dominance’, where the latter was a political practice that overwhelmingly relied on coercion. In a colonial context where the state relied substantively on coercion and the consent of a comprador class, this would be better understood as a limited hegemony or ‘minimal hegemony’ (Ali, 2015: 244). I would add that minimal hegemony also includes state violence inhibiting autonomous political organising among subaltern classes, a form of coerced consent.…”
Section: The Imperial Geometry Of Food Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manner of KICTANet inclusion into the WSIS process on the one hand is an ideal case of how power and legitimacy can be accrued through 132 collective action and association. From another vantage point it illustrates how consent can be manufactured (Ali, 2015;Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1999;Burawoy, 1979).…”
Section: Virtual Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%