2010
DOI: 10.1080/13507481003660936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading menageries: using eighteenth-century print sources to historicise the sensorium of menagerie spectators and their encounters with exotic animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visits to living animals were of a multi-sensory nature. 38 In the Strand and Piccadilly, the paying public could see a number of different snake-shows, handbills for which provide rich detail of the experiences on offer. Implicitly, it was understood that subjected to a civilizing influence in their new temperate surroundings, most animals could be 'tamed'.…”
Section: Expectations and Realitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visits to living animals were of a multi-sensory nature. 38 In the Strand and Piccadilly, the paying public could see a number of different snake-shows, handbills for which provide rich detail of the experiences on offer. Implicitly, it was understood that subjected to a civilizing influence in their new temperate surroundings, most animals could be 'tamed'.…”
Section: Expectations and Realitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon work showing a consideration for the multi-sensory nature of visits to menageries, this article considers the broader materiality of animal display beyond the visual and tries to recover the participation of audiences. 10 The snakes at the reptile house provide a lens through which to explore Victorian notions of evil and morality in relation to spectacle. The theatricality of the reptile house undoubtedly contributed to its appeal to visitors and to the readers of the popular periodicals and serialized fiction in which it became a fixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%