“…The dynamics of duricrust formation is still debated, especially in remote places, and requires further geochronological investigations of the different minerals forming the duricrust. High-resolution geochronological tools allow us to determine the different coexisting generations of the same mineral and to constrain the formation and evolution of weathering surfaces, for example, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar on K-bearing minerals (Vasconcelos et al, 1994;Ruffet et al, 1996;Hénocque et al, 1998;Carmo and Vasconcelos, 2006;Beauvais et al, 2008;Riffel et al, 2015;Deng et al, 2016), (U-Th)/He dating on Fe-oxides (Shuster et al, 2005;Heim et al, 2006;Danišík et al, 2013;Monteiro et al, 2014;Riffel et al, 2016;Allard et al, 2018;Wells et al, 2019;Anand et al, 2021;Heller et al, 2022), or electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) on kaolinite (Balan et al, 2005;Allard et al, 2018). Iron oxide, a mineral ubiquitous in lateritic profiles, has proven its usefulness in the study of weathering episodes at the scale of a regolith (Shuster et al, 2005;Bernal et al, 2006;Monteiro et al, 2014;Riffel et al, 2016;Allard et al, 2018), which explains why the (U-Th)/He dating methods are widely used for laterite material.…”