2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511920813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading the Ruins

Abstract: From fires to ghosts, and from flowers to surrealist apparitions, the bombsites of London were both unsettling and inspiring terrains. Yet throughout the years prior to the Second World War, British culture was already filled with ruins and fragments. They appeared as content, with visions of tottering towers and scraps of paper; and also as form, in the shapes of broken poetics. But from the outbreak of the Second World War what had been an aesthetic mode began to resemble a proleptic template. During that co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Far from literature being cast out of the classroom, it was to be directly critiqued for its ideological predilections. Many concerned with creating ‘critical, resistant readers’ were doing so very much in the context of the traditionally literary (Martino & Mellor, 1995; Mellor, 1989; Mellor et al, 1987; Worth & Guy, 1998)—hence, perhaps, the place of contesting complex and challenging ideas in the AC:E course, Literature . This very reality of ‘critical, resistant readers’ being created in Literature classrooms was, in fact, central to the ‘culture wars’ background to Australia's national curriculum—that it was actually the study of literature that was turning away from ‘appreciating’ the aesthetic and turning too far towards creating ‘resistant’ readers (Gannon & Sawyer, 2015).…”
Section: Class and Imagined Publicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far from literature being cast out of the classroom, it was to be directly critiqued for its ideological predilections. Many concerned with creating ‘critical, resistant readers’ were doing so very much in the context of the traditionally literary (Martino & Mellor, 1995; Mellor, 1989; Mellor et al, 1987; Worth & Guy, 1998)—hence, perhaps, the place of contesting complex and challenging ideas in the AC:E course, Literature . This very reality of ‘critical, resistant readers’ being created in Literature classrooms was, in fact, central to the ‘culture wars’ background to Australia's national curriculum—that it was actually the study of literature that was turning away from ‘appreciating’ the aesthetic and turning too far towards creating ‘resistant’ readers (Gannon & Sawyer, 2015).…”
Section: Class and Imagined Publicsmentioning
confidence: 99%