2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Birmingham score validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study defined patients as high-risk based on the ISGPS definition ( 7 ). However, this relies on subjective assessment of pancreatic texture, which is an important limitation, and it may have been more appropriate to use an objective risk score (e.g., alternative Fistula Risk Score or Birmingham Risk Score) ( 8 , 9 ). The operating surgeon’s experience is likely to be a major factor in determining the incidence and severity of POPF, although the evidence to support this hypothesis is relatively limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study defined patients as high-risk based on the ISGPS definition ( 7 ). However, this relies on subjective assessment of pancreatic texture, which is an important limitation, and it may have been more appropriate to use an objective risk score (e.g., alternative Fistula Risk Score or Birmingham Risk Score) ( 8 , 9 ). The operating surgeon’s experience is likely to be a major factor in determining the incidence and severity of POPF, although the evidence to support this hypothesis is relatively limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%