2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2003.tb00773.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ready for Prime Time: The When, Who, and Why of International Mediation

Abstract: Most of the literature on international dispute resolution emphasizes timing and “ripeness” when considering whether or not a dispute is suitable for mediation. In addition to this focus, the authors believe analysts should consider whether a particular mediator is “ready for prime time.” Their framework posits that one may gauge the appropriateness of a mediator for a particular dispute along three different types of considerations: operational and political; strategic and diplomatic; and relationship and cul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of states, they are more likely to mediate in a confl ict in the neighbouring state than to engage in resolving confl icts in far-away countries. However, Croker, Hampson and Aall (2003) argue that the mediator decides to undertake mediation upon the analysis of his or her operational abilities, including political, strategic and diplomatic as well as having relations that allow all sides of the confl ict to be infl uenced.…”
Section: The Mediator and His Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of states, they are more likely to mediate in a confl ict in the neighbouring state than to engage in resolving confl icts in far-away countries. However, Croker, Hampson and Aall (2003) argue that the mediator decides to undertake mediation upon the analysis of his or her operational abilities, including political, strategic and diplomatic as well as having relations that allow all sides of the confl ict to be infl uenced.…”
Section: The Mediator and His Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the studies above solely focus on reasons for third-parties to mediate; but besides being motivated, a third-party should also have the capabilities to mediate. This gap is addressed by Crocker et al (2003) in an article in 2003, in which they argue, on the basis of many illustrative examples, that scholars of mediation should also consider whether the mediator is ready at the operational and political, strategic and diplomatic, as well as the relational levels. However, recent scholarship has neglected the issue of whether a mediator is ready to mediate in terms of resources.…”
Section: The Mediators' Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, however, there is a consensus that ‘Timing in launching negotiations is often decisive’ (Stein and Lewis, 1996, p. 467). There is little consensus however, as to what constitutes a ripe moment for mediation and when the mediator should enter the conflict (Crocker et al ., 2003).…”
Section: Power Impartiality and Timing In Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%