1978
DOI: 10.1021/ja00485a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reagent distribution and micellar catalysis of carbocation reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for dissociations constants indicate a strong association, with the ion strongly incorporated into the kinetic micelle, which explains the catalytic effect of these surfactants. The difference between the catalytic activity of CBDAC and HTAB can be accounted for qualitatively, adopting the Bunton model [22]. The reaction rate increases as HO -ions bind stronger with the surfactant and displace the bromine ions from the double charged layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values for dissociations constants indicate a strong association, with the ion strongly incorporated into the kinetic micelle, which explains the catalytic effect of these surfactants. The difference between the catalytic activity of CBDAC and HTAB can be accounted for qualitatively, adopting the Bunton model [22]. The reaction rate increases as HO -ions bind stronger with the surfactant and displace the bromine ions from the double charged layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The malachite green is very well incorporated into the anionic micelles and less in the cationic micelles [22]. In the presence of SDS, the malachite green loses its carbocationic character due to the incorporation into the anionic micelle; the total charge of the micelle is negative, so the approaching of HO -ion is restrained (4) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of for 3 V ϭ 0.14 dm m CTAB micelles (i.e., the volume of the Stern layer) as found by Bunton and coworkers [20]. However, the value of V m for non-ionic TX-100 was estimated by using an oblate ellipsoid [21,22] instead of a spherical micellar model [20].…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Substrate, S , is distributed between water and micelles, and can react in either medium (Scheme 2). In Scheme 2 sub- where [OH,-] is a molarity in terms of total solution volume and the second-order rate constant, kM, is written in terms of the mole ratio of micellar-bound OH-to micellar head groups [18]: …”
Section: Reactions In the Presence Of Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 99%