Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: theory

Makarios, Triantafyllos K.; Anastassiadis, K.

doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1794(199803)7:1<33::aid-tal95>3.0.co;2-d

Cited by 68 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cheung and Tso (1986) proposed the 'rigidity centers (CRs)' for structural applications and the need to determine a vertical axis (at least in uniform over the height building structures) which can be identified as a minimum torsion axis has led to many approximations. Makarios and Anastassiadis (1998) introduced the concept of the 'axis of optimum torsion' and an alternative mathematical procedure was proposed by Marino and Rossi (2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity

Georgoussis

2015

Can. J. Civ. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common types of multistory buildings, detailed according to a planar static analysis under a code lateral loading, may have a practically translational behavior when the mass axis is passing through (or within a close distance from) the modal center of rigidity (m-CR). The concept of this point in elastic multistory structures was introduced by the author in earlier papers, but it retains its value in structures composed by inelastic bents, since it specifies the optimum arrangement of these structural elements in terms of producing minimum torsional response in the case of a strong ground motion. This is demonstrated in typical five story buildings, composed by moment resisting frames and structural walls, under the ground motions of Kern County and Loma Prieta.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity

Georgoussis

2015

Can. J. Civ. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Out of the methods available in literature [57][58][59][60][61][62], the one proposed by Makarios and Anastassiadis [60,61] is used for the determination of the uncoupled torsional to lateral frequency ratios. According to this method, the uncoupled ratios X hy and X hx , corresponding to the seismic force acting along the y-and x-direction, respectively, are calculated as the ratios of the rigidity radii of gyration r kx and r ky to the mass radius of gyration r m .…”

Section: Prediction Of Seismic Response By Nonlinear Static Methods Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting displacement demand of multi-storey asymmetric buildings by nonlinear static analysis and corrective eccentricities

Bosco

Ferrara

Ghersi

et al. 2015

Engineering Structures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This design method is much easier to handle than those presented before because of the lack of design eccentricities. Indeed, it should be noticed that calculation of any design eccentricity preliminarily requires evaluation of the parameters e s and θ , which can be rigorously defined only with reference to regularly asymmetric buildings and evaluated in actual buildings only by means of complex and generally approximate procedures (Calderoni et al 2002, Makarios andAnastassiadis 1998a andb;Marino and Rossi 2004).…”

Section: The Proposed Design Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Static versus modal analysis: influence on inelastic response of multi-storey asymmetric buildings

Ghersi

Marino

Rossi

2007

Bull Earthquake Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the influence of design procedures on the seismic response of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. To this end, some structures are designed according to methods based on either static or modal analysis, with or without design eccentricities. The seismic response of these systems is determined by means of inelastic dynamic analyses and the design is thoroughly examined in order to explain the results of the dynamic analyses. Attention is basically focused on the ability of design methods to prevent asymmetric buildings from experiencing ductility demands much larger than those of the corresponding torsionally balanced systems. Numerical analyses underline that while design procedures based on either static or modal analysis are suitable for the design of torsionally rigid structures only those based on modal analysis lead to the satisfactory performance of torsionally flexible buildings. Furthermore, the study highlights the qualities of a design method proposed by the Authors. Its application does not require any explicit calculation of design eccentricities and leads to proper seismic response of both torsionally rigid and flexible asymmetric buildings.

show abstract

Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: theory

Cited by 68 publications

References 11 publications

Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity

Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity

Predicting displacement demand of multi-storey asymmetric buildings by nonlinear static analysis and corrective eccentricities

Static versus modal analysis: influence on inelastic response of multi-storey asymmetric buildings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About