2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real electronic signal data from particle accelerator power systems for machine learning anomaly detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is worth highlighting an important difference between the data we used here (from the RFTF) and the data we published recently from the main 15 HVCMs powering the SNS (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022). The previously published data (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022) have many fault events recorded from multiple modules, however, the data are not continuous in time as only the pulse before the fault event is available, i.e., that data cannot be used for prognosis applications but can be used for multi-class fault classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is worth highlighting an important difference between the data we used here (from the RFTF) and the data we published recently from the main 15 HVCMs powering the SNS (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022). The previously published data (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022) have many fault events recorded from multiple modules, however, the data are not continuous in time as only the pulse before the fault event is available, i.e., that data cannot be used for prognosis applications but can be used for multi-class fault classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, it is worth highlighting an important difference between the data we used here (from the RFTF) and the data we published recently from the main 15 HVCMs powering the SNS (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022). The previously published data (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022) have many fault events recorded from multiple modules, however, the data are not continuous in time as only the pulse before the fault event is available, i.e., that data cannot be used for prognosis applications but can be used for multi-class fault classification. The current RFTF data are steamed with a much better time continuity, where system configuration and settings remain almost the same, which make them a good fit for prognosis even though the number of fault sources/varieties is very limited, i.e., cannot be used for multi-class classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are a total of 15 HVCMs in the SNS, driving a total of 92 klystrons, where the HVCM powering the RFQ section (3 klystrons) was the subject of the analysis in our previous effort (Radaideh, Pappas, Walden, et al, 2022). We recently shared the normal and fault data collected from the 15 HVCMs of the SNS (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022), collected over 2 years with the data being sparse in time (recorded signals can be separated by hours and even days). Given their time sparsity, that data (Radaideh, Pappas, & Cousineau, 2022) or models can be used for fault classification and identification but not for early fault detection (or prognosis), which is the motivation behind this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that radio-frequency (RF) cavities are the fundamental building blocks of particle accelerators, and given that these devices generate information-rich data, a lot of research has been directed toward detection, isolation, classification, and prediction of anomalies in RF systems [3][4][5][6]. Recent work also applies anomaly detection methods to superconducting magnets [7], to identify and remove malfunctioning beam position monitors (BPMs) [8], and classify or predict errant signals [9,10], among many other applications [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%