2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10231-016-0617-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real hypersurfaces in the complex hyperbolic quadric with Reeb parallel shape operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we consider a hypersurface M in the complex hyperbolic quadric Q m * , under the assumption of some geometric properties the unit normal vector field N of M in Q m can be divided into two classes if either N is A-isotropic or A-principal (see [3], [30], [33], and [34]). In the first case where [33] has shown that a real hypersurface M in Q m * with isometric Reeb flow is locally congruent to a tube over a totally geodesic CH k in Q 2k or a horosphere with A-isotropic center at the infinity.…”
Section: If There Exist a Conjugationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we consider a hypersurface M in the complex hyperbolic quadric Q m * , under the assumption of some geometric properties the unit normal vector field N of M in Q m can be divided into two classes if either N is A-isotropic or A-principal (see [3], [30], [33], and [34]). In the first case where [33] has shown that a real hypersurface M in Q m * with isometric Reeb flow is locally congruent to a tube over a totally geodesic CH k in Q 2k or a horosphere with A-isotropic center at the infinity.…”
Section: If There Exist a Conjugationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each point [z]M we define scriptQ[z]={XT[z]MAXT[z]Mnormalfor0.33emnormalallAfrakturA[z]},which is the maximal Afalse[zfalse]‐invariant subspace of T[z]M. Then by using the same method for real hypersurfaces in complex hyperbolic quadric Qm as in Suh [36], and Suh and Hwang [39] we get the following: Lemma Let M be a real hypersurface in complex hyperbolic quadric Qm. Then the following statements are equivalent: (i)The normal vector Nfalse[zfalse] of M is frakturA‐principal. (ii)scriptQ[z]=scriptC[z]. (iii)There exists a real structure AfrakturA[z] such that AN[z]Cν[z]M. …”
Section: The Maximal Fraktura‐invariant Subbundle Scriptq Of Tmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we consider a hypersurface M in the complex hyperbolic quadric Qm, the unit normal vector field N of M in Qm can be divided into two classes if either N is frakturA‐isotropic or frakturA‐principal (see [33], [34], [36] and [39]). In the first case where N is frakturA‐isotropic, we have shown in Theorem 1.2 that M is locally congruent to a tube over a totally geodesic complex hyperbolic space CHk in Q2k or a horosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we consider the Ricci operator Ric$Ric$ on a real hypersurface M in the complex quadric Qm$Q^m$. When we consider a hypersurface M in the complex quadric Qm${Q}^m$, the unit normal vector field N of M in Qm$Q^m$ can be divided into two classes according to N is A$\mathfrak {A}$‐isotropic or A$\mathfrak {A}$‐principal (see [27, 29, 31, 33, 34]). A real hypersurface M in Qm$Q^m$ is said to be isometric Reeb flow if the structure tensor ϕ commutes with the shape operator S of M in Qm$Q^m$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%