“…Alongside the growing use of competencies within organizations a parallel debate has raised significant concerns about their effectiveness and the extent to which they really relate to improved or superior performance at either an individual or organizational level. Five of the more commonly cited weaknesses include: (1) the reductionist way in which this approach fragments the management role rather than representing it as an integrated whole (Ecclestone, 1997;Grugulis, 1998;Lester, 1994); (2) the universalistic/generic nature of competencies that assumes a common set of capabilities no matter what the nature of the situation, individuals or task (Grugulis, 2000;Loan-Clarke, 1996;Swailes & Roodhouse, 2003); (3) the focus on current and past performance rather than future requirements (Cullen, 1992;Lester, 1994); (4) the way in which competencies tend to emphasize measurable behaviours and outcomes to the exclusion of more subtle qualities, interactions and situational factors (Bell et al, 2002); and (5) the rather limited and mechanistic approach to education that often results (Brundrett, 2000). Despite these criticisms, however, the competency movement has gathered momentum rather than slowed down and recent years have seen an expansion of the approach to incorporate leadership as well as management.…”