2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:joth.0000035243.24060.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Quadratic Fields and the Ankeny–Artin–Chowla Conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to rewrite (16). In the resulting congruence use (2) and (3) to show that the terms that are not multiples of p cancel each other.…”
Section: ä ññ 21ºmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to rewrite (16). In the resulting congruence use (2) and (3) to show that the terms that are not multiples of p cancel each other.…”
Section: ä ññ 21ºmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the history of the above congruence and conjecture see [16]. All of this is quite important but we would like to look for explicit congruences of the same type that are valid for a different class of fields and modulo higher powers of p. In this direction, S. Jakubec, using algebraic techniques in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], has established congruences of Ankeny-Artin-Chowla type modulo p and p 2 for totally real cyclic fields K of degree l and prime conductor p. Perhaps his technique is best summarized in [14: Section 1], the notation of which we are going to follow (reader is encouraged to consult [14] if needed).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%