2010
DOI: 10.1039/c000887g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-space imaging of nanoplasmonic resonances

Abstract: Resonant nanoplasmonic structures have long been recognized for their unique applications in subwavelength control of light for enhanced transmission, focussing, field confinement, decay rate management, etc. Increasingly, they are also integrated in electro-optical analytical sensors, shrinking the active volume while at the same time improving sensitivity and specificity. The microscopic imaging of resonances in such structures and also their dynamic variations has seen dramatic advances in recent years. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eigenmodes of various nanoantennas have been measured by different means [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . However, problematic in further advancing the field is the lack of analytical insight into the scaling behavior of optical nanoantennas to carefully design them for a desired application [26][27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eigenmodes of various nanoantennas have been measured by different means [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . However, problematic in further advancing the field is the lack of analytical insight into the scaling behavior of optical nanoantennas to carefully design them for a desired application [26][27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, indirect measurement techniques such as photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM), 3,4 electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS), 3,5 and cathodoluminescence (CL) 3,5 are powerful, yet limited. PEEM relies on the photoemission of electrons from the surface/structure, while EELS involves the detection of electron energy losses and CL requires emitted radiation to be captured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These methods require high vacuum and complex detection equipment, making them impractical for many situations. Direct methods include photon scanning tunneling microscopy (PSTM) 3,7,8 and both aperture and scattering near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM). 3,9,10 These techniques involve probing the structure, however they are limited by the probe's aperture diameter or tip apex radius, and thus, the direct methods are limited to ~10nm resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, techniques with high spatial resolution can be used to explore the characteristics of the isolated unit cell. Whereas the ensemble can usually only be characterized in the farfield, and the necessary techniques are summarized as whole-field techniques, in the latter strategy that probes the properties of individual unit cells, information can be acquired in the far-field but also in the near-field [ 148 ]. Due to this distinction this chapter is divided into two sections.…”
Section: Optical Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%