The on‐surface synthesis of low‐dimensional organic nanostructures has been extensively investigated through both experimental and theoretical methods, particularly by density functional theory (DFT). However, the complex mixture of interactions often poses challenges within the DFT framework, and there is a knowledge‐gap regarding how the choice of DFT approach affects the computed results. Here, five different approaches including vdW interactions, i.e., PBE+D3, PBE+vdWsurf, rev‐vdW‐DF2, r2SCAN+rVV10 and BEEF‐vdW, are employed to describe three prototypical on‐surface reactions; dehydrogenation of benzene, debromination of bromobenzene, and deiodination of iodobenzene on the (111) facets of the coinage metals. Overall, rev‐vdW‐DF2 outperforms the other methods in describing benzene adsorption, whereas BEEF‐vdW falls short. For dehydrogenation and debromination on Cu(111), all functionals except BEEF‐vdW give reasonable activation energies compared to experiments. A similar trend is observed for Ag(111) and Au(111), with BEEF‐vdW yielding significantly higher activation and reaction energies. For dehalogenation, all the five vdW approaches correctly capture the reactivity trend – Cu(111) > Ag(111) > Au(111) – and the expected hierarchy between bromobenzene desorption and carbon‐ bromine activation. Only BEEF‐vdW fails to predict the faster kinetics of deiodination than the iodobenzene desorption. Our work forms a basis for evaluating density functionals in describing chemical reactions on surfaces.