2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015rs005932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time 3‐D electron density reconstruction over Europe by using TaD profiler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDP modeling under the lack of RO data is typically performed by means of the standard Chapman model, defined by the peak height, h m F 2 , the peak electron density N m F 2 , and the scale height H, which is assumed constant in different works and modeling scenarios, such as (1) the topside of the profile: from in situ low-earth orbiting electron density measurements [see Tulasi Ram et al, 2009], from radio-occultation measurements [see Liu et al, 2008] or for combining GPS and ionosonde data in geomagnetic storm scenarios [Zhu et al, 2016]; (2) the ionospheric and plasmaspheric modeling [see González-Casado et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2016;Kutiev et al, 2016]; (3) the Multilayer Chapman model [Alizadeh et al, 2015]; (4) the Ionospheric correction in tropospheric radio-occultation modeling [see Danzer et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2016].…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Electron Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDP modeling under the lack of RO data is typically performed by means of the standard Chapman model, defined by the peak height, h m F 2 , the peak electron density N m F 2 , and the scale height H, which is assumed constant in different works and modeling scenarios, such as (1) the topside of the profile: from in situ low-earth orbiting electron density measurements [see Tulasi Ram et al, 2009], from radio-occultation measurements [see Liu et al, 2008] or for combining GPS and ionosonde data in geomagnetic storm scenarios [Zhu et al, 2016]; (2) the ionospheric and plasmaspheric modeling [see González-Casado et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2016;Kutiev et al, 2016]; (3) the Multilayer Chapman model [Alizadeh et al, 2015]; (4) the Ionospheric correction in tropospheric radio-occultation modeling [see Danzer et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2016].…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Electron Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TID-induced perturbations in electron density predicted with the TaD model. The Topside Sounder Model (TSM)-assisted Digisonde (TaD) profiler provides vertical electron density profiles (EDP) above Digisonde sounding stations operating in Europe, from the bottom of the ionosphere up to the GNSS orbit altitude (Kutiev et al, 2016). This model is based on the Topside Sounder Model (TSM) proposed by Kutiev et al (2006).…”
Section: Large Scale Tid Detection Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the electron density distribution in the bottomside and topside ionosphere over an extended region such as Europe, we apply the 3D version of the TaD model. The 3D mapping technique is described in Kutiev et al (2016). The TaD profiler first computes electron density profiles (EDP) over the European Digisonde locations.…”
Section: Specification Of Ionospheric Background Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations