2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Bayesian data assimilation with data selection, correction of model bias, and on-the-fly uncertainty propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each realization we compute several performance metrics, which are averaged over all time steps t = 1, ..., T. We compute the state estimation error for each component, i = 1, 2, as given by the absolute difference between the digital twin estimate,Q i t , and the ground-truth value. We also compute the observation error, t , as given in (14). Finally, we report the accuracy of the UAV's decision making, given by the percentage of time steps in which the action taken by the UAV (informed by the state estimate), matches the optimal action (informed by the ground truth).…”
Section: Digital Twin Model Adaptation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For each realization we compute several performance metrics, which are averaged over all time steps t = 1, ..., T. We compute the state estimation error for each component, i = 1, 2, as given by the absolute difference between the digital twin estimate,Q i t , and the ground-truth value. We also compute the observation error, t , as given in (14). Finally, we report the accuracy of the UAV's decision making, given by the percentage of time steps in which the action taken by the UAV (informed by the state estimate), matches the optimal action (informed by the ground truth).…”
Section: Digital Twin Model Adaptation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), our inference procedure does not automatically correct for model bias. Future work could involve extending our approach in this direction (see for example [14,15,36]). Our methods have been demonstrated using a case study in which a fixed-wing UAV uses structural sensors to detect damage or degradation on one of its wings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This representation is computed in an offline phase with controlled accuracy [8] before being evaluated at low cost in the online phase. It is shown in the paper that the PGD technique (i) facilitates the computation of the likelihood function involved in the Bayesian inference framework [3,26]; (ii) can be effectively coupled with Transport Map sampling for the calculation of the maps, as it directly provides information on solution derivatives [27,28]; (iii) is a particularly effective tool for performing uncertainty propagation through the forward model as well as command law synthesis. A particular focus is made here on the latter point dealing with effective command in a stochastic framework; this has been investigated in very few works of the literature, even though it is a major aspect of the DDDAS procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%