2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time classification of L-H transition and ELM in KSTAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for an efficient and stable β N -enhanced suppression phase, it is necessary to introduce the latest achievements related to the RMP technique. The pre-emptive RMP onset based on the real-time Machine Learning (ML) classifier [36], which automatically triggers RMP before the first ELM after the L-H transition, can obtain a higher ion temperature at the plasma core region compared to the conventional pre-set RMP onset [37]. The interactive I RMP control by the adaptive feedback RMP ELM controller balances β N enhancement and ELM crash suppression by optimizing I RMP [15,38,39], in contrast to the conventional pre-set I RMP control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for an efficient and stable β N -enhanced suppression phase, it is necessary to introduce the latest achievements related to the RMP technique. The pre-emptive RMP onset based on the real-time Machine Learning (ML) classifier [36], which automatically triggers RMP before the first ELM after the L-H transition, can obtain a higher ion temperature at the plasma core region compared to the conventional pre-set RMP onset [37]. The interactive I RMP control by the adaptive feedback RMP ELM controller balances β N enhancement and ELM crash suppression by optimizing I RMP [15,38,39], in contrast to the conventional pre-set I RMP control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section explains the proposed algorithm for real-time MLbased control of the ELM. As shown in figure 1, the algorithm uses two real-time diagnostic signals consisting of the poloidal D α emission [22] and the line-averaged electron density from the KSTAR two-color interferometer [23,24] for classifying plasma states as low-confinement mode (L), intermediate state (I), H-mode (H), or ELM (E) following the definition of the plasma state in previous work [19]. The D α signal detects from photomultiplier tubes the neutralizing emission amplitude of deuterium, measuring the characteristic drop of the edge turbulence level during the L-H transition and the ELM burst amplitude, which needs to be suppressed.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patterns of the first L-H transition and ELMs in KSTAR fusion plasmas can be classified by the diagnostic features of D α emission and line-averaged electron density [18,19] because the time-series diagnostic signals have characteristic patterns that allow the classification of the H-mode transition and the ELMs. As previously reported in reference [19], the LSTM, which is a supervised machine learning method, performs well for memorizing patterns from long sequential data with a relatively short inference time and high classification accuracy. In the KSTAR PCS, the LSTM classifier is the core part of the real-time ELM control algorithm.…”
Section: Description Of Lstm Classifier In Kstar Pcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations