2016
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/12/p12018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time control of the beam attenuation with XPAD hybrid pixel detector

Abstract: In order to fully benefit from a beam produced by modern synchrotron light sources, characterised by a wide and continuous energy spectrum, high brightness and a very high intensity, advancement in detector technology has been made over the last decades. However, one of the main limitations of the state-of-the-art counting hybrid pixel detectors is the maximum count-rate that is very often few orders of magnitudes lower than of the incident, reflected or diffracted beam flux. Therefore, direct beam attenuation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample was analyzed with 18.46 keV X-rays at a grazing incidence angle of 0.2°. Scattered X-rays were detected with a X-ray Pixel chips with Adaptive Dynamics hybrid pixel detector [14]. Diffracted intensity was measured by performing a series of rocking scans around diffraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was analyzed with 18.46 keV X-rays at a grazing incidence angle of 0.2°. Scattered X-rays were detected with a X-ray Pixel chips with Adaptive Dynamics hybrid pixel detector [14]. Diffracted intensity was measured by performing a series of rocking scans around diffraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the experimental setup, the beamline energy was chosen to be 11.9 keV and the focus size was set to 1 (h)  0.04 (v) mm 2 . Therefore, we followed the surface evolution by GISAXS with the 2D detector (XPAD3 Hybrid Pixel Detector, pixel size 130 lm  130 lm) [24] and detected GIXRPD and XRR with the point detector (Model Cyberstar, Echirolles cedex, France) (see Fig. 2).…”
Section: Measurements With a 2d And A Point Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a) in the case of a Pd(100) single crystal with low mosaicity. A sample rotation is still needed to record the whole reciprocal space, which is traditionally performed at lower photon energies using a smaller 2D detector, involving a time-consuming point-topoint movement of the sample and detector arm, which can be significantly speeded up by a continuous movement of the detector arm and synchronized readout of the detector and automatized absorber system [25,26]. Alternatively, also at lower, conventional photon energies a stationary, large 2D detector could also be employed for fast data recording, together with fast online data analysis to create distortion-free cuts through reciprocal space, as they are directly delivered in very good approximation in the high-energy case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%