2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.00187
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Deep Video Deinterlacing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed MFDIN is compared with traditional single field vertical interpolation (SFI) and recent DNN-based deinterlacing methods, i.e., DICNN [4] and DIN [5]. In addition, we also retrained a deeper single-frame model EDSR [3] with 16RBs and a SOTA multi-frame model EDVR [7].…”
Section: Results On the Synthetic Testing Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed MFDIN is compared with traditional single field vertical interpolation (SFI) and recent DNN-based deinterlacing methods, i.e., DICNN [4] and DIN [5]. In addition, we also retrained a deeper single-frame model EDSR [3] with 16RBs and a SOTA multi-frame model EDVR [7].…”
Section: Results On the Synthetic Testing Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that simple SFI method can reduce the comb-teeth effect, but it also enlarges various mixed artifacts. DICNN [4] is a lightweight shallow network with few parameters. However, it is only designed for real-time deinterlacing tasks, and thus cannot handle the complex noise in early videos.…”
Section: Results On the Synthetic Testing Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations