Inefficiencies
and imprecise input control in agriculture have
caused devastating consequences to ecosystems. Urban controlled environment
agriculture (CEA) is a proposed approach to mitigate the impacts of
cultivation, but precise control of inputs (i.e., nutrient, water,
etc.) is limited by the ability to monitor dynamic conditions. Current
mechanistic and physiological plant growth models (MPMs) have not
yet been unified and have uncovered knowledge gaps of the complex
interplay among control variables. Moreover, because of their specificity,
MPMs
are of limited utility when extended to additional plant species or
environmental conditions. Simultaneously, although machine learning
(ML) can uncover latent interactions across conditions, phenotyping
bottlenecks have hindered successful application. To bridge these
gaps, we propose an integrative approach whereby MPMs are used to
construct the foundations of ML algorithms, reducing data requirements
and costs, and ML is used to elucidate parameters and causal inference
in MPM. This review highlights research about control and automation
in CEA, synthesizing literature into a framework whereby ML, MPM,
and biofeedback inform what we call dynamically controlled environment
agriculture (DCEA). We highlight synergistic characteristics of MPM
and ML to illustrate that a DCEA framework could contribute to urban
resilience, human health, and optimized productivity and nutritional
content.