2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2009.5209533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time fuzzy trajectory generation for robotic rehabilitation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To complete the fuzzy inference system, the Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) inference method is integrated into the system to determine the corresponding crisp outputs for each input set. This unique approach to the generation of fuzzy rules for compliant trajectory generation was proposed in [9] and is shown in Fig. 1 (Block A).…”
Section: B Compliant Trajectory Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete the fuzzy inference system, the Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) inference method is integrated into the system to determine the corresponding crisp outputs for each input set. This unique approach to the generation of fuzzy rules for compliant trajectory generation was proposed in [9] and is shown in Fig. 1 (Block A).…”
Section: B Compliant Trajectory Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During robot-assisted rehabilitation, this path is altered using compliance or impedance control strategies that are developed using interaction forces and position errors [17,24,27]. Robot path generation from the recordings of subject-specific and trainer-induced leg trajectories is proposed in [28,29]. On the other hand, the further advanced path generation strategy proposed by Vallery et al [30] exploits the learning of healthy limb movements in deciding the commanded robot path for hemiplegic patients.…”
Section: Takedownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desired or reference paths for rehabilitation robots are normally well-defined paths that are encountered during ADLs. During therapeutic treatments, these motion paths require altering after acquiring more information about the patient's abilities from their interaction with robots and subsequent measurements [29]. This information can also be obtained from the movements of healthy limbs in hemiplegic patients [30].…”
Section: B Rehabilitation Path Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following devices are not included in this review: platformbased robotic devices, e.g. Rutgers Ankle (31), which require the patient to be in a seated position (32,33); robotic devices utilizing functional electrical stimulation (FES) (34,35); and passive orthoses with no mechanical power or actuation (36). The preliminary design and evaluation of robotic orthoses published in the form of conference proceedings is also not included in this review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%