2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time gait event detection using wearable sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control and Evaluation Detection algorithms based on machine learning and rulebased heuristics are used to identify gait events/phases [6,9,15,[17][18][19][20]. Catalfamo et al [9] evaluated the detection of IC and end of the contact (foot off ) using a single gyroscope on the shank which was validated with seven control subjects walking on level ground and an inclined surface.…”
Section: A Real-time Gait Event Detection For Lower Limb Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Control and Evaluation Detection algorithms based on machine learning and rulebased heuristics are used to identify gait events/phases [6,9,15,[17][18][19][20]. Catalfamo et al [9] evaluated the detection of IC and end of the contact (foot off ) using a single gyroscope on the shank which was validated with seven control subjects walking on level ground and an inclined surface.…”
Section: A Real-time Gait Event Detection For Lower Limb Prosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such footswitches are suitable for obtaining on/off information, though not appropriate for precise analog measurements [6]. However, they are susceptible to mechanical failure, have generally poor durability and low cosmetic acceptance [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many control algorithms have been implemented using machine learning techniques and simple rule-based approaches [3,12,13] to identify gait phases/events. However, none of the previous studies have dealt with transfemoral amputees (TFA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they are widely used for rehabilitation during assisted gait and for FES synchronization during walking [11], and to synchronize the activity of exoskeletons [12]. Compared to a footswitch system, accelerometers have a lower accuracy (mean absolute error of 2.4 ms2.1 ms for the footswitch system compared to 9.5 ms9.0 ms for the accelerometer system) [13]. Furthermore, determining temporal parameters using accelerometers, despite their portability, requires the use of correction factors and intense mathematical processing through specific computational algorithms, a fact that complicates the use of real time results [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%