2019
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Intraoperative Determination and Reporting of Cerebral Autoregulation State Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is maintained over a range of blood pressures through cerebral autoregulation (CA). Blood pressure outside the range of CA, or impaired autoregulation, is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Regional oxygen saturation (rS o 2 ) derived from near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can be used as a surrogate CBF for determining CA, but existing methods require a long period of time to calculate CA metrics. We have developed a no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have measured cerebral autoregulation using cross-correlation analysis between continuously measured blood pressure and either invasive (intracranial pressure, brain tissue oximetry) or non-invasive (NIRS-based cerebral oximetry, TCD-based CBF velocity) ( Zweifel et al, 2008 ; Aries et al, 2010 ; Andresen et al, 2018 ; Montgomery et al, 2020 ) neuromonitoring modalities. We did not use this method because MAP variation was low (<5 mmHg) for long periods during monitoring, thus did not yield wide enough MAP ranges to generate full autoregulation curves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have measured cerebral autoregulation using cross-correlation analysis between continuously measured blood pressure and either invasive (intracranial pressure, brain tissue oximetry) or non-invasive (NIRS-based cerebral oximetry, TCD-based CBF velocity) ( Zweifel et al, 2008 ; Aries et al, 2010 ; Andresen et al, 2018 ; Montgomery et al, 2020 ) neuromonitoring modalities. We did not use this method because MAP variation was low (<5 mmHg) for long periods during monitoring, thus did not yield wide enough MAP ranges to generate full autoregulation curves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have measured cerebral autoregulation using cross-correlation analysis between continuously measured blood pressure and a neuromonitoring modality, invasive (intracranial pressure, brain tissue oximetry) or non-invasive (NIRS-based cerebral oximetry, TCD-based CBF velocity) [35][36][37][38] . We did not use this method because MAP variation was low (<5 mmHg) for long periods during monitoring, thus did not yield wide enough MAP ranges to generate full autoregulation curves each day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although future directions for cerebral oximetry include entropy and trend analyses, as well as integrated cerebral autoregulatory blood pressure threshold assessments, the most crucial steps toward more clearly establishing its role in cardiac surgery, and in optimizing neurocognitive outcomes, will be the conduct of more high-quality trials, using standardized outcome assessments at homogenized time points, in line with consensus definitions. [92][93][94]…”
Section: Conclusion-nirs Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%