Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing - 1992
DOI: 10.3115/974499.974506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time linguistic analysis for continuous speech understanding

Abstract: This paper describes the approach followed in the development of the linguistic processor of the continuous speech dialog system implemented at our labs. The application scenario (voice-based information retrieval service over the telephone) poses severe specifications to the system: it has to be speakerindependent, to deal with noisy and corrupted speech, and to work in real time. To cope with these types of applications requires to improve both efficiency and accuracy. At present, the system accepts telephon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formalisms used in SUNDIAL are Unification Categorial Grammar for English and French (Andry et al 1992), Augmented Phrase Structure Grammar for German (Tropf 1989), and Dependency Grammar for Italian (Poesio and Rullent 1987). Two different parsing strategies have been used: left-to-right bottom-up parsing (Andry and Thornton 1991) and island parsing which selects starting points for parsing on the basis of the best acoustic scoring hypotheses (Baggia et al 1992).…”
Section: Front End Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formalisms used in SUNDIAL are Unification Categorial Grammar for English and French (Andry et al 1992), Augmented Phrase Structure Grammar for German (Tropf 1989), and Dependency Grammar for Italian (Poesio and Rullent 1987). Two different parsing strategies have been used: left-to-right bottom-up parsing (Andry and Thornton 1991) and island parsing which selects starting points for parsing on the basis of the best acoustic scoring hypotheses (Baggia et al 1992).…”
Section: Front End Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%