2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time measurement of blood pressure with Nexfin in a patient with thalidomide-related phocomelia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of bioreactance cardiac output monitoring in conjunction with serial bed‐side echocardiograms and more traditional methods of volume status assessment such as urine output and central venous saturations provided a basis for fluid management. One case report has described the successful use of continuous blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring via photoplethysmographic technology as used by the Nexfin monitor (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in a patient with phocomelia [8]. We elected not to use this intra‐operatively due to the possibility of digit ischemia and the inability of the patient to express discomfort while under anaesthesia, but this could have been used as an alternative method of monitoring postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of bioreactance cardiac output monitoring in conjunction with serial bed‐side echocardiograms and more traditional methods of volume status assessment such as urine output and central venous saturations provided a basis for fluid management. One case report has described the successful use of continuous blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring via photoplethysmographic technology as used by the Nexfin monitor (BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in a patient with phocomelia [8]. We elected not to use this intra‐operatively due to the possibility of digit ischemia and the inability of the patient to express discomfort while under anaesthesia, but this could have been used as an alternative method of monitoring postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%