2008
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.9.1353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Measurement System for Evaluation of the Carotid Intima-Media Thickness With a Robust Edge Operator

Abstract: The CIMT has been accepted as a noninvasive marker of early vascular alteration. At present, the manual approach is largely used to estimate CIMT values. However, that method is highly operator dependent and time-consuming. For these reasons, we developed a new system for the CIMT measurement that conjugates precision with real-time analysis, thus providing considerable advantages in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
100
2
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
100
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…ear old TUFFC D [10,12] , e CCA e CCA for the studies [15] , the ages of es were ntation 15,21] , a butions MC was ke were ynamic sented. nted in ue from [18] and ore still ntioned techniques in a more atheroscler…”
Section: -939xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ear old TUFFC D [10,12] , e CCA e CCA for the studies [15] , the ages of es were ntation 15,21] , a butions MC was ke were ynamic sented. nted in ue from [18] and ore still ntioned techniques in a more atheroscler…”
Section: -939xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran the semiautomated FOAM as a standalone on our 665-image database and obtained an average IMT value of 0.804 ± 0.243 mm, with an IMT measurement bias of 0.001 ± 0.223 mm when compared to reader 1 and 0.032 ± 0.255 mm when compared to reader 2. Therefore, on our multi-institutional database, we could not obtain the same performance Faita et al 25 obtained on their single-institution data set. Our explanation is that we worked on a multi-institutional database consisting of images with different pixel densities (Table 1) and noise levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The best performing computer method we found in the literature was the semiautomated technique by Faita et al, 25 which was based on FOAM. They obtained an average IMT measurement error of about 0.010 ± 0.038 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations