2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-015-0456-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Monitoring and Assessment of Thermal and Toxicological Risk Associated with Fire Retardant Textiles in a Full-Size Simulation of an Engulfment Flash Fire

Abstract: Abstract. A comparative risk assessment was performed on nine commercial flameretardant materials in garments intended for general occupational use. The assessment evaluated the relative hazards associated with combustion gases during a full engulfment flash fire in accordance with ASTM F1930 and ISO 13506. The materials in the form of whole body coveralls were subjected to propane-fired flash conditions of 84 kW/m 2 for a duration of 3 or 4 s. Combustion gas composition and concentrations were measured in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… [20] During five routine fire incident response cases in South Florida that took place between August 2016 and February 2017, we describe multigas detector levels situated within the warm zone of the fire response to document gas exposures from gas and particulate emissions for those firefighters who did not enter the hot zone, but operated in the warm zone only. We define the warm zone based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) definition which characterizes the fire in potential for hazard [21] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… [20] During five routine fire incident response cases in South Florida that took place between August 2016 and February 2017, we describe multigas detector levels situated within the warm zone of the fire response to document gas exposures from gas and particulate emissions for those firefighters who did not enter the hot zone, but operated in the warm zone only. We define the warm zone based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) definition which characterizes the fire in potential for hazard [21] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a structure fire, firefighters expose themselves to high amounts of known carcinogens while inside the structure or in the IDLH environment [20] . This observation has been extensively studied, and firefighter behavior and PPE guidelines have adapted over the years to minimize the exposure risk [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%