2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time monitoring of food price policy interventions during the first two years of COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the agricultural policy, pandemic prevention measures and supply chain upgrading strategy promoted by the Chinese government in recent years, which have increased the resilience of food supply chain (specifically in the adaptation aspect). The results support the findings of Jiang et al (2021) and Consoli et al (2023). Meanwhile, government decision-makers should also be alert to major health events such as COVID-19 which breaks the food supply chain by depressing consumption prices and enterprise profits for a long time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is mainly due to the agricultural policy, pandemic prevention measures and supply chain upgrading strategy promoted by the Chinese government in recent years, which have increased the resilience of food supply chain (specifically in the adaptation aspect). The results support the findings of Jiang et al (2021) and Consoli et al (2023). Meanwhile, government decision-makers should also be alert to major health events such as COVID-19 which breaks the food supply chain by depressing consumption prices and enterprise profits for a long time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, when a serious outbreak of zoonotic infectious diseases causes reduction of raw material supply, labor shortage, production cost increase, and fluctuations in food production, the prices of raw materials and food rise rapidly. The results verify the findings of Saboori et al (2022) and Consoli et al (2023). Therefore, when serious infectious diseases break out, government decision-makers should be vigilant and prevent the sharp rise of agricultural products and food prices in the short term.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…While some existing studies have illustrated the relationship between food security policy and food price from the perspective of food policy reform [ 29 ], they have not analyzed this relationship in the context of responding to public health emergencies. Other studies have developed indicators, such as the monthly nominal rate of protection, an “express” indicator to reflect the real-time impact of food security emergency policy on grain prices [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], but have not considered the influence of food types and regional heterogeneity. This study differs from previous research in that it uses two indicators, the food price volatility index ( CV ) and food price increase rate ( ROC ), to quantitatively and visually analyze the relationship between China’s food security emergency policy and four kinds of food prices, in order to clarify the impact of food security emergency policy on food prices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses mainly on answering the previous discussion in academia; that is, since the COVID-19 epidemic has caused severe damage to residents’ mental health, will residents’ mental health improve after relaxing the control policy of the COVID-19 epidemic? Meanwhile, we discuss the possible mechanism or reason from the perspective of family tourism consumption, unlike many previous studies that only studied the influence of COVID-19 on one aspect, such as the enterprise supply chain, food import and export, household production decisions, and the mental health of residents ( 10 , 93 , 94 ). However, the current study explores the link between RCC, family tourism consumption, and the mental health of residents, which could provide a more plausible explanation for the knock-on effects of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%