2004
DOI: 10.1029/2003gl018845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐time monitoring of South American smoke particle emissions and transport using a coupled remote sensing/box‐model approach

Abstract: Since August 2000, the Wild fire Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm (WF_ABBA) has been generating half‐hourly fire hot spot analyses for the Western Hemisphere using GOES satellites to provide the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS) with near‐real‐time fire products. These are used to generate smoke particle fluxes for aerosol transport forecasting to benefit the scientific, weather, and regulatory communities. In South America, fire hot‐spot analysis is shown to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although clouds can effectively remove aerosols through scavenging and rainout, they can also generate aerosol (e.g., in-cloud aqueous production of sulfate). Some studies suggest that significant biases may exist in some regions, when satellite measurements only for cloud-free conditions are assimilated into a model (Reid et al, 2004;Zhang and Reid, 2009). Partial constraints on the aerosol load above clouds could be obtained using the emerging satellite observations of AOD above clouds from CALIOP lidar Hu et al, 2007;Chand et al, 2008) and even passive sensors like POLDER, OMI, and MODIS (Waquet et al, 2009;Torres et al, 2012;Jethva et al, submitted for publication;Yu et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Limitations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although clouds can effectively remove aerosols through scavenging and rainout, they can also generate aerosol (e.g., in-cloud aqueous production of sulfate). Some studies suggest that significant biases may exist in some regions, when satellite measurements only for cloud-free conditions are assimilated into a model (Reid et al, 2004;Zhang and Reid, 2009). Partial constraints on the aerosol load above clouds could be obtained using the emerging satellite observations of AOD above clouds from CALIOP lidar Hu et al, 2007;Chand et al, 2008) and even passive sensors like POLDER, OMI, and MODIS (Waquet et al, 2009;Torres et al, 2012;Jethva et al, submitted for publication;Yu et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Limitations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correct transport modeling of smoke aerosol is almost entirely dependent on satellite-derived products that either identify and count fire hotspots or more quantitatively measure fire radiative power and relate that to aerosol emissions Pereira et al, 2009;Reid et al, 2009;Giglio et al, 2010;van der Werf et al, 2010;Ichoku et al, 2012 and references therein;Petrenko et al, 2012). The diurnal pattern of smoke emissions has been determined by applying overpasses at multiple times per day by the twin MODIS sensors on the polar orbiting Terra and Aqua satellites (Vermote et al, 2009;Ichoku et al, 2008), or using geostationary satellite observations (Reid et al, 2004;Zhang and Kondragunta, 2008). For mineral dust, most models rely on satellite data of land surface classification to identify the location of deserts, and a few models use satellite vegetation index data to impose the seasonal variation of the surface bareness for better temporal variation of dust emission (e.g., Zender et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Source Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the potential for using geostationary systems for this purpose has received a significant amount of attention (Prins and Menzel, 1994;Prins et al, 1998;Govaerts et al, 2002;Roberts et al, 2005). In particular, active fire detections derived from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) satellite have been used by Reid et al (2004) and Holben et al (1996) to parameterize the lower boundary condition of atmospheric process models in order to determine smoke emissions longevity, transport, effects and fate, and despite their relatively coarse spatial resolution (4 km at nadir) the GOES-derived active fire data has shown significant impacts on forecasts of atmospheric aerosol loading (Reid et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods to convert the fire information to emissions of atmospheric tracers are based on empirical scaling coefficients from the burnt area (models GWEM of , FLAMBE of Reid et al (2004), INPE/CPTEC of Freitas et al, 2005) or, rarely, from the hot spots (GFED, Van der Werf et al, 2003) to fluxes of a mixture of species. The lists of species included in the emission models vary but usually CO 2 , CO and the total mass of aerosols are included, as these are amongst the most important constituents emitted by fires and measured in the atmosphere, thus allowing a direct calibration of a modelling system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%