2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time neutral beam power control on MAST

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that the magnitude of the redistribution effect is related to the plasma electron density and the NBI power. The magnitude of the redistribution effect has additionally been shown to be related to the magnitude of the FB mode growth rate which, in turn, is related to the magnitude of the FI distribution function radial gradient through equation (1). Significantly, a region of the parameter space investigated at high plasma density and relatively low beam power has been demonstrated to be free of FI redistribution by FBs either through the complete absence of FBs or due to the low growth rates of FBs, leaving the FI population relatively unperturbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been demonstrated that the magnitude of the redistribution effect is related to the plasma electron density and the NBI power. The magnitude of the redistribution effect has additionally been shown to be related to the magnitude of the FB mode growth rate which, in turn, is related to the magnitude of the FI distribution function radial gradient through equation (1). Significantly, a region of the parameter space investigated at high plasma density and relatively low beam power has been demonstrated to be free of FI redistribution by FBs either through the complete absence of FBs or due to the low growth rates of FBs, leaving the FI population relatively unperturbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the injection energy chosen, the neutral power injected by the second beamline (that fitted with the "chequerboard" source) was 1.6MW. Of course, considering the different ion sources in use on the two beamlines a small perturbation to the energy gradient is expected but this was assumed to be small compared to the changes effected in the ⁄ term in equation (1). Motional Stark Effect (MSE) measurements may only be obtained when the "supercusp" beam is injecting power hence the choice of this for the single beam shots resulting in MSE measurements being available for all 8 shots in the parameter scan.…”
Section: 1experimental Basis and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As beam divergence is dependent on both beam current and acceleration voltage (through the perveance), ramping the ion beam current will affect the beam cross section, and beamline transmission. The real time control of an arc current of a high perveance MAST PINI allows variations of the neutral beam power by ∼20% with only minimal effect on the beam footprint [9].…”
Section: Nbi Optimisation and Power Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MAST-U, a real time NB power control system to actively control beam timing and power is currently being developed. This will involve an in-house built FPGA-based master [5] (connected to the SCADA System using Modbus) controlling individual injector based FPGA controllers, which will include controlling beam power by actively controlling arc voltage and current [6]. From initial measurements it can be seen there are associated time lags due to filament thermal effects, the arc notch (causing a small overshoot at beginning of the beam) and the arc controller feedback circuits ( figure 5).…”
Section: Future Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%