Real-time patients assignment: A method for improving emergency department flow

Mazier, Alexandre; Xie, Xiaolan; Sarazin, Marianne

doi:10.1109/whcm.2010.5441274

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They are the first step in the process of sorting and filtering patients based on clinical symptoms, including the classification of incoming patients into different levels of urgency ranging from immediate attention to the least urgent (Strand and Flaatten, 2008). As we know, the length of stay (LOS) in the ED is limited to 24-48 hours (Mazier et al, 2010). Through communication and visits with medical staff, once the beds are full in ED, existing high-acuity ED patients (who would be admitted anyway) must be expedited into available inpatient beds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal admission and queuing control with reneging behavior under premature discharge decisions

Yang

Zhang

et al. 2023

Int Trans Operational Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Queues or waiting lines are a common phenomenon in healthcare facilities. The increasing number of admissions to hospital emergency departments (EDs) has resulted in overcrowded EDs and decreased quality of care. Patients may renege with dissatisfaction while waiting, prolonged hospital stays, or the cancelation of surgeries, especially for those with acute diseases. This paper studies patient admission and queuing control policies, considering premature discharge decisions and reneging behavior. First, we formulate this problem as an infinite‐horizon total discounted cost Markov decision process to balance bed utility and experiences of patients waiting for admission to minimize the total expected cost for the hospital. Then, we characterize an optimal admission threshold policy by analyzing the structural properties of the optimal value function. Numerical experiments are employed to discuss how the optimal dynamic policy depends on some key parameters of the system. Finally, the performance of the optimal policy is discussed through comparison with the benchmark: A myopic rule (first come, first served) mimicking the decision‐making in practice under different scenarios. The numerical results show that the reneging behavior can affect the superiority of the optimal policy compared to the benchmark, and the optimal policy can significantly reduce the number of waiting patients without increasing the total expected cost when the system is overloaded.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%