2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03950.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐Time PCR Assay to Detect DNA in Sera for the Diagnosis of Deep‐Seated Trichosporonosis

Abstract: Deep-seated trichosporonosis due to Trichosporon asahii is life-threatening and has high mortality. A real-time PCR assay to detect T. asahii DNA in sera for diagnosis of this fungal infection was developed. The assay showed a higher sensitivity than polysaccharide antigen detection method. Our new real-time PCR assay may be used for diagnosing deep-seated trichosporonosis due to T. asahii.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have also been reports on the design of species-specific primers for real-time quantitative PCR based on the IGS1 region for the detection of T. asahii in whole blood samples. However, the procedure required extraction of DNA from blood samples for amplification, which increased the total time of detection [29]. Our previous study on the detection of T. asahii using LAMP technology also showed requirement for DNA extraction after obtaining pure culture, and the cost of this technology was much higher than that of PCR, both of which hindered the application of this technology in clinical practice [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been reports on the design of species-specific primers for real-time quantitative PCR based on the IGS1 region for the detection of T. asahii in whole blood samples. However, the procedure required extraction of DNA from blood samples for amplification, which increased the total time of detection [29]. Our previous study on the detection of T. asahii using LAMP technology also showed requirement for DNA extraction after obtaining pure culture, and the cost of this technology was much higher than that of PCR, both of which hindered the application of this technology in clinical practice [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%