2014
DOI: 10.4067/s0301-732x2014000200021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time PCR-based study of haemotrophic mycoplasmas in dogs from Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of M. haemocanis (4.7%) found in the present study was similar to that reported in dogs sampled in an urban area (4.2%) located in the same state of Mato Grosso do Sul (Soares et al, 2016). On the other hand, the found occurrence of M. haemocanis was higher than that found in dogs sampled in the states of Pernambuco (Ramos et al, 2010), northeastern Brazil (1/205), and São Paulo (Alves et al, 2014) (3/154), but lower than that found in dogs sampled in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (17/331) (Valle et al, 2014). Only two studies reported the molecular detection of 'Candidatus M. haematoparvum' in dogs from Brazil, in the states of São Paulo (Alves et al, 2014) and Rio Grande do Sul (Valle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The occurrence of M. haemocanis (4.7%) found in the present study was similar to that reported in dogs sampled in an urban area (4.2%) located in the same state of Mato Grosso do Sul (Soares et al, 2016). On the other hand, the found occurrence of M. haemocanis was higher than that found in dogs sampled in the states of Pernambuco (Ramos et al, 2010), northeastern Brazil (1/205), and São Paulo (Alves et al, 2014) (3/154), but lower than that found in dogs sampled in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (17/331) (Valle et al, 2014). Only two studies reported the molecular detection of 'Candidatus M. haematoparvum' in dogs from Brazil, in the states of São Paulo (Alves et al, 2014) and Rio Grande do Sul (Valle et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although hemoplasmas have been detected in domestic cats (Braga et al, 2012;Miceli et al, 2013;André et al, 2014;Santis et al, 2014) and dogs (Ramos et al, 2010;Alves et al, 2014;Valle et al, 2014;Soares et al, 2016) from several localities in Brazil, few reports have documented the occurrence of hemoplasma species in wild animals. For instance, hemoplasmas have been detected in wild carnivores maintained in captivity in zoos (Willi et al, 2007;Guimarães et al, 2007;André et al, 2011), wild rodents (Vieira et al, 2009;Conrado et al, 2015;Gonçalves et al, 2015), monkeys (Bonato et al, 2015), and deer (Grazziotin et al, 2011) in Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on frequency using PCR to detect M. haemocanis have been conducted in several regions of Brazil, and have presented similar results (RAMOS et al, 2010;COSTA, 2011;ALVES et al, 2014). In the present study, only samples from dogs parasitized by R. sanguineus s.l.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In Brazil, canine hemotropic mycoplasmas has been reported in the northeastern region (RAMOS et al, 2010;SILVA-SANTOS et al, 2014), southeastern region (O'DWYER et al, 1997;ALVES et al, 2014), southern region (VALLE et al, 2014) and central-western regions (COSTA, 2011). In the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), which is located in the central-western region of Brazil, only one survey of hemoplasmas mycoplasmas has been conducted so far, among cats (SANTIS et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low prevalence of infection found is similar to that found in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul: a 4.25% infection rate among 94 dogs tested (SOARES et al, 2016). However, the infection rate in this study was higher than the observed prevalence of M. haemocanis (1.9%) and Candidatus M. haematoparvum (0.6%) in 154 dogs from Ribeirão Preto (ALVES et al, 2014). The difference between the prevalences may vary according to the population sampled, the distribution of R. sanguineus (a probable vector), or the sensitivity of the diagnostic technique employed (AQUINO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%