2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time PCR for mumps diagnosis on clinical specimens—Comparison with results of conventional methods of virus detection and nested PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Follicle-stimulating and several similar hormones are excreted in urine at great enough concentration to be extracted commercially. Alternatively, TSE infectivity may be excreted by processes analogous to those responsible for the low-level virurias that occur during infections of the nervous system by mumps, measles, and West Nile virus (28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follicle-stimulating and several similar hormones are excreted in urine at great enough concentration to be extracted commercially. Alternatively, TSE infectivity may be excreted by processes analogous to those responsible for the low-level virurias that occur during infections of the nervous system by mumps, measles, and West Nile virus (28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other PCR diagnostic tests for mumps virus detection have been developed previously, including nested and two-step RT-PCR assays (11,17,19,22). A recent study describes a successful modification of the real-time RT-PCR, used by Uchida and colleagues, into a one-step assay (12). The authors reported a high degree of sensitivity and specificity for oral specimens but not for urine specimens (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the elution volume was decreased for the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit, the input volume was doubled for the QIAamp DNA Mini kit and water was not added to the swab when the RTP DNA/RNA Virus Mini kit was employed. Increasing sample volume has also been performed by Krause et al (2006), who used oral samples for the detection of mumps and obtained good recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%