Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics 2018
DOI: 10.5220/0006927300130020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Phase Detection for EEG-based tACS Closed-loop System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a closed-loop implementation based on a model described earlier (see Figure 1A and Zarubin et al, 2018 ) to apply tACS stimulation either in-phase or in anti-phase (phase-shifted by 180°) of ongoing visual alpha-band activity. In brief EEG signals were extracted online.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a closed-loop implementation based on a model described earlier (see Figure 1A and Zarubin et al, 2018 ) to apply tACS stimulation either in-phase or in anti-phase (phase-shifted by 180°) of ongoing visual alpha-band activity. In brief EEG signals were extracted online.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present the results of a study using a previously used closed-loop EEG-tACS protocol (Zarubin et al, 2018 ) by which the stimulation signal was phase coupled with ongoing alpha oscillations. In particular, we investigated the effects of repeated short durations of tACS (1 s) applied over the visual cortex on alpha amplitude when tACS signals and ongoing alpha visual alpha oscillations were phase-synchronized (in-phase) or in opposite phase (anti-phase) and in different states, when alpha levels were high in amplitude (eyes closed, EC) or low (eyes opened, EO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For phase prediction we utilized the same Hilbert-based approach as tested and validated in our previous study (Zarubin et al, 2018). This method is based on the assumption that with short time intervals we can consider phase dynamics to be quasi stationary, which allows us to perform phase prediction by the extraction phase information from a current (pre-stimulation) interval in order to forecast phase dependent stimulation for the following interval.…”
Section: Phase Prediction Delay Estimation and Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euclidean difference (L 2 norm) for vectors of instantaneous phase between extraction interval and various generated sine waves was criteria for minimization -in case of "in-phase" relation, and maximization in case of "anti-phase" relation. Transduction and optimization delays were estimated and compensated with the same procedure as validated in (Zarubin et al, 2018). For the chosen phase prediction method (Hilbert-based), the average value of optimization delay across all subjects was 15±2.4 ms and average transduction delay was 72 ms.…”
Section: Phase Prediction Delay Estimation and Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation